Remove me

To whom it may concern,

As of this 27th day , in the month of May, of the year 2022, I, Alva Richard Roberts IV, do not give any person permission to use my data in any manner to produce profit or carry forward a political agenda. This includes non-profits that feel they need to track elections. I immediately revoke any permission any corporation may feel I have given them regarding Considerable Personal Identifiable Information. For the record, I define Considerable Personal Identifiable Information as an Image of my person, my residence, and/or my car, use of my Full or Partial Legal Name, Date of Birth, Current and Former Address(es), Current and Former Employer(s), Current and Former Email Address(es), Current and Former Phone Number(s), Current and Former Voter Registration Data, Current and Former Employers, and/or numbers associated with my current or former accounts.

While it may be true that some private and personal information may be publicly accessible on a Government website or in a courthouse. If the entity is a corporation not formed by a Federal, State, or Local Entity that could be construed as an Official Government Entity, then I refuse my personal permission and consent to use my name or likeness to associate with any county, city, or state in a book or periodical, on the world wide web, or in a database or file for any purpose or reason.

No Non-Official Government Corporation or Place of Business has my personal permission and consent to use my name or likeness to associate with any any email, phone, or place of employment in a book or periodical, on the world wide web, or in a database or file for any purpose or reason..

No Non-Official Government Corporation or Place of Business has my personal permission and consent to use my name or likeness to associate with any name or likeness to another person in a book or periodical, on the world wide web, or in a database or file for any purpose or reason.

No Non-Official Government Corporation or Place of Business has my personal permission and consent to use my name or likeness to associate with any Date of Birth, Date of Death, or any Time Stamping Marks in a book or periodical, on the world wide web, or in a database or file for any purpose or reason.

No Non-Official Government Corporation or Place of Business has my personal permission and consent to use my Image or likeness in a book or periodical, on the world wide web, or in a database or file for any purpose or reason.

I feel that some of my 1st, 3rd, 4th, 9th, and 14th Amendment Rights might be or have been violated. In response to that risk, I am taking actions to remove data about myself from the world wide web. I feel my right of privacy and personal choices can be supported with the following court cases Roe v Wade (1972)(I am aware that Roe v Wade has been over turned.) (Choices of a private nature), Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) (Choices of a private nature), Poe v. Ullman (1961) (Choices of a private nature), Eisenstadt v Baird (1971)(Choices of a private nature), Kelley v Johnson (1976) (Choices of a private nature), Moore v. East Cleveland (1977) (Choices of a private nature), Lawrence v Texas (2003) (Choices of a private nature).

The first Amendment states, ”Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.' My choice of having others perceive my persona as a private citizen and reflect that my home is private and not a public matter and should not be used for the profit or political agenda of others. My personal choices such as residence, phone carrier, email provider, circle of friends, are of a private nature and should not be used for the profit or political agenda of others. My personal life such as who my parents, siblings, and children, my Deity, my political party affiliation choices are mine alone and are all private matters which should not be used for the profit or political agenda of others .

The 3rd Amendment states, “No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.” During World War II they didn't have the internet, everything was done in analog and the politically incorrect force chose to force some individuals to wear a yellow stars publicly. I feel this action of posting data on the internet is done for a different reason, but is giving the same results. Regardless the reason it I expressly feel it is denying my expressed liberties that are afforded in the United States Constitution.

The 4th Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized .” Without formal request in writing to use my Considerable Personal Identifiable Information seems to be the civil or corporate and business equivalent of “No Warrant” . This aforementioned act feels like it could aid an unreasonable internet search. Such a Search could lead to further sale or redistribution of my Considerable Personal Identifiable Information to be applied for uses of profit or tied to a political agenda which I do not want to reflect my personal persona.

Other forms of law that have protected personal contact information would include Public Law No. 108-82 which expressly authorized the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under Section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act to implement and enforce a Do-Not-Call Registry, and ratified the Registry provision of the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii). I actively taken part in this program since February 09, 2016 with my current contact information.

Storing data on a computer server and hosting it publicly is beyond the scope of the do not call registry and the laws that mandated it. I feel that it is offensive to publicize considerably personal identifiable information on the web without specified safeguards because while items like sex offender registries, court records, and voter registration are stored on information systems and sometimes hosted on the internet, many of those systems state the recording of Internet protocol addresses and other forms of data to help identify the source of the database query. That information can be requested in the event something happens to someone who's data is stored on that information system by using the Freedom of Information Act Requests.

These privately hosted websites that store the same data or data that is similar in likeness of data stored on Government websites and physical courthouse locations do not afford the same security and liberties to the people in which publication has been made without their express permission. Criminals do not say they are a criminals and they will click in order to get an address, full name, and date of birth in order to deceive a person. Current Gun control Laws are legal measure intended to prevent or restrict the possession or use of guns. This act of loose information stewardship that seems to be hosted by Non-Government Corporations and Businesses feels like it is just as dangerous as an unsecured Fire Arm.

Now that I have expressed I feel these actions are offensive I am sure its is understood that I feel my right of publicity has been violated by the definitions found in the Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts, § 652. I personally do not want my information on the world wide web open to everyone especially on a site that publicizes for political or financial gain without logging or requesting an valid source of identification.

Harassment is generally defined as an act that is annoying, threatening, intimidating conduct or actions placing a person in fear of their safety. With my previous moral injury, I feel that these actions of posting information about myself make me feel less safe and secure. The Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act has not expanded to cover these non connected entities as of yet but I hope soon it will, but until then I feel I need to start remedying these issues myself or with the help of others so I feel more secure or more safe.

Conspiracy is generally a plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful. These groups may or may not have parties that have contracts with other parties to provide internet services that are not aware of their conspiratorial actions. Normally a good contract will include Indemnity and hold harmless clauses. This may will work only as long as the party has no knowledge of wrong doing of a third party such as violating the Right afforded in the United states Constitution of the third party and the third party has not contacted them and expressed they do not wish those rights be denies. Upon that discovery if the party providing services to deny the right of another citizen even if by contract could be vicariously conspiring against the third party. (See Franklin Music Co. v. Am. Broadcasting Companies, Rex Distributing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liab. for Econ. Harm § 27 (2020))

The act of disclosing information without my express permission makes me feel I have been harassed using technology and communications equipment. Some will say everyone gets a large amount of spam calling but I have had a phone for longer than three years and these calls weren't as bad when non-government corporations and businesses were not posting large amounts of data about people. I personally have noticed that calls have increased on my phone from unknown numbers along with mass amounts of junk mailings in my mailbox since I have seen my data on the world wide web.

Now that I have stated I have a moral injury, I need to mention that these actions that make me feel unsafe could be the cause for my heightened state of paranoia and anxiety. So I have to wonder if it is not a violation the Americans with Disability Act under Title III: Public Accommodations. While it mainly states issues around accessibility, I also feel it implies the nature of a business using someone information with a person with a disabilities information should not worsen the condition of their disability in such a person that they have used their information without permission. I honestly feel like I have to give up my right of privacy to vote, so I may have to sacrifice my right to choice what type of Government I wish to have. That feels counterproductive on the liberties afforded in the constitution and seems to affect my accessibility to vote.

This statement is to assist any person working as an agent to stop the oppression of liberty and is working on my behalf to remove any data that violates my freedom of expression, choice, and privacy from a corporations and private businesses which feels its has rights equal to or above the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” Any private entity that is not formed by the Federal, State, or local Government, saying they can publicize data about a citizen because a governing body is publicizing said data is more or less saying they have the right because citizens have no rights over their personal choices. I may not have the right but this statement is proof that some did not just let Non-Government Corporation and Businesses do what they feel is a violation of their rights and an oppression of their liberties.

The 14th amendment provides that no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Since the 14th Amendment also empowers a corporation similar rights to that of a citizen then that would mean any corporation feeling it has power over another citizen is in violation of the same amendment that gave said Corporate Entity rights it similar to a citizen.

The Ninth Amendment states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” I am pretty sure this means when another citizen such as a corporate entity ignores the rights of another citizen be it a citizen or corporate entity they can be held accountable with civil remand.

This statement is to further help other persons and entities realize I am a citizen of the United States of America and I have protected rights as such with in the boundaries of the jurisdiction of the United States Constitutions.

Cordially,

Alva Richard Roberts IV